Please join us for the evidentiary hearing. It is open to the public.
Monday, July 28, 2014 at 2pm to 4:45pm
Tuesday, July 29, 2014 at 10am to 4:45pm
Wednesday, July 30, 2014 at 10am to 4:45pm
Thursday, July 31, 2014 at 10am to 3:00pm
The latest developments and progress regarding Save The Corcoran's efforts.
Please join us for the evidentiary hearing. It is open to the public.
Monday, July 28, 2014 at 2pm to 4:45pm
Tuesday, July 29, 2014 at 10am to 4:45pm
Wednesday, July 30, 2014 at 10am to 4:45pm
Thursday, July 31, 2014 at 10am to 3:00pm
July 21, 2014
Opponents of the deal to reorganize the Corcoran Gallery of Art won a major procedural victory in D.C. Superior Court on Monday afternoon, setting up a four-day hearing next week where clashing visions of what should become of Washington’s oldest art museum will be tested through witness testimony and documentary evidence.
Reading his opinion from the bench to a packed courtroom for 20 minutes, Judge Robert Okun ruled that nine members of the advocacy group Save the Corcoran must be admitted as intervening parties in a proceeding launched by the Corcoran last month to revise its 1869 charter.
The nine include seven current students of the Corcoran College of Art and Design, one anonymous faculty member, and one anonymous member of the staff of the gallery. The two “John Doe” parties do not want to be identified for fear of “retaliation,” according to their written declarations submitted by the opponents’ attorney, Drew Tulumello, a partner with Gibson Dunn & Crutcher.
Okun accepted Tulumello’s argument that the nine have a “special interest” in the proceeding and could be affected by the outcome. The Corcoran is seeking court approval to turn over the college to George Washington University and to give most of the gallery’s art to the National Gallery of Art.
The ruling means that after two years of advocating their cause through demonstrations, speeches and media interviews, strong skeptics of the Corcoran’s leadership will have a chance to prove their case in a courtroom.
After court adjourned, smiling members of Save the Corcoran embraced one another.
“It means everything,” said Miguel Perez, 24, a fine arts photography major entering his junior year and one of the students admitted into the case. “An active voice in this is what the students have wanted all along.”
“It’s the right thing to happen, before you can dissolve an institution like the Corcoran — all of these questions should be answered,” said Jayme McLellan, an organizer of Save the Corcoran.
The opponents insist that the Corcoran can continue as an independent gallery and college and claim that Corcoran leaders have not demonstrated that dissolving the institution is the only way forward.
Corcoran executives counter that intractable financial problems leave no alternative and that pairing with the National Gallery and GWU is best way to carry on the Corcoran’s legacy of art education and art exhibition.
Corcoran attorney Charles Patrizia, a partner with Paul Hastings, warned the court that if the deal with the National Gallery and GWU is derailed, the gallery may have to close and the college’s future would be uncertain.
The arrangement between the Corcoran, the National Gallery and GWU is not set to close before Aug. 12. It is contingent on the court’s approval of the new arrangement.
Okun scheduled an evidentiary hearing to begin next Monday afternoon and continue through Thursday if necessary.
There’s been a lot of talk and worry, sharing of speculation, half-truths, untruths, some facts, and a lot fear about what will come next for the Corcoran.
Only two things are known for sure: First, that on July 18th, 2014, there will be a court hearing about breaking the historic Corcoran Deed and Charter with a judge, where the Save the Corcoran coalition (STC) will get time at the podium. This court hearing was asked for by the current Corcoran trustees. Save the Corcoran has asked to be a part of it. Anyone can attend this hearing on July 18th.
When: July 18, 2014 2:30 pm
Where: Courtroom 317, Moultrie Courthouse, 500 Indiana Ave. NW, Washington D.C. 20001
Second, that July 18th will determine if a judge rules to allow STC to articulate its case in court. If a judge rules that STC cannot be part of the suit, the trustees plan to dissolve the Corcoran into GWU, and the NGA moves forward. Until then, Save the Corcoran continues to add more plaintiffs to the suit and encourages anyone to contact the Office of the Attorney General.
A critically important note: Save the Corcoran’s work, for the past two years, has ONLY been done to work toward a vibrant future for the college, the museum, and all of the people affected by such, including its students, alumni and staff. This work is not done to cause more damage. It is done in the hopes of creating a secure, thriving future for the Corcoran—as a whole—led by capable leaders with proven track records; and guided by its founding documents, as established so long ago to encourage the American Genius. We do not envision a lop-sided Corcoran with the museum or the college having greater importance. Both are needed – they are interdependent – and they can be led to thrive.
Save the Corcoran cannot negotiate a partnership or move in any other direction except toward the court date on July 18th. This date decides everything. As one faculty member pointed out, if STC loses, at least we took a stand and told the public some of what the board has done to undermine the Corcoran, including damaging the health and futures of real people – staff, faculty, and students.
There is no way to predict if Save the Corcoran will get standing in court on July 18th. While we are optimistic about our chances, the Trustees will strongly oppose our efforts. If Save the Corcoran does not get standing, the trustees plan goes forward. None of the work we have done thus far slows down the process of the trustees’ current plan. It does not delay their work with GW, or use extra funds that the Corcoran doesn’t have. They are already paying their lawyers to do this deal.
Clearly, we have a “Which came first: The chicken or the egg?” deal here. Staff, faculty, curators, members, donors, past trustees, alumni – so many people—want the board held accountable for squandering the Corcoran’s assets, hiring unqualified leaders, and so much more. But staff, faculty, and curators also need their jobs; even if they are just one-year contracts, with no guarantee that they will get anything more from GW or NGA.
And those who have already lost their jobs are counting on severance packages to carry them through until they find work. Joining a lawsuit, at this time for any of the above, is risky. Yet some have joined, and they will be protected.
Finally, if STC gets standing, faculty and staff want and deserve a sound plan to keep the Corcoran running while the court decides what is to come next. However, a solid plan cannot truly unfold in great detail until the current board leaves the Corcoran. This will happen only if they are forced out by their own past wrongdoing, as decided by the courts.
Despite firing everyone else, the trustees aren’t going to fire themselves. They are not going to leave, nor are they going to ask us to join them in partnership. We’ve tried for over two years to have a meaningful dialogue with the board. They have brushed aside our repeated offers to help, and have done as they wished, while not being truthful to the people fighting so hard every day to make the Corcoran work. And we know this has not been in the best interest of the Corcoran.
In the words of one faculty member, “Everyone is totally tapped out, overworked, disrespected, and aware of their insecure future at GW or NGA. Not to mention the worries about what the students will face once that GW takes over.”
Save the Corcoran knows, intimately, that the faculty’s position has been extremely difficult in all of this. If they do not get renewed contracts after their one-year GW contracts, what is left of the college as an internal mechanism of GW from 2015 onward? Further, some of the members of this lawsuit are faculty hoping to work in September. Save the Corcoran is not the opposition to the Corcoran – we are also the Corcoran. We are its students, faculty, alumni, donors, staff, former staff, members, and people in the art community. Not all names are public, in order to protect those who want to speak out about what has happened over the past two years but fear for their jobs or severance.
There is a great concern that if the institution is split –through the Trustee-initiated GW/NGA deal—and the collection is distributed across the nation, it will be easy to challenge the original Corcoran intent since the institution won’t exist anymore. We very much feel that this lawsuit is the last chance to save the Corcoran.
All of this said, it would be irresponsible for any intervening party—STC included—to not be concerned about 550 currently enrolled students who plan to work toward their degrees this September, as well as the faculty and staff who will make this happen. Students have not only paid for their education and are entitled to one; they are the future of any new Corcoran, and faculty is its life-blood. This goes for the museum staff as well.
No one left inside of the Corcoran thinks the Board has the capacity to put a contingency plan together. In short, trustees tried to “bake the cake,” making any option other than the dissolution of the institution impossible.
We’ve learned that well before STC announced our complaint, faculty were already dreading the next school year under any circumstances; there will be only a few, extremely dedicated staff members left, and twenty-two ranked faculty to educate students through what promises to be an extremely disorganized and rough year, after which faculty might get fired anyway.
This was the feeling BEFORE Save the Corcoran launched the suit last week. We did not create this terrible reality – the Corcoran trustees did. They are calling all of the shots; 13 people who have little experience running museums or schools are making all of this happen.
If Save the Corcoran gets standing on July 18th, new leadership will need to work with the Attorney General, the faculty, and the staff to get through this school year while a new plan or leadership group works on a powerful plan for the future. Save the Corcoran will not support any deal that shuts down the school. Since Trustees have not planned a museum season, this will need to be addressed. An emergency plan will need to be created.
Wayne Reynolds, who was courted by the Corcoran – by Harry Hopper himself— in November 2012 to become the Board Chair, still wants to be the Board Chair. Wayne didn’t become Board Chair then because he did not approve of the Board’s course of action, and he told them so. But his last stint was in reviving and invigorating Ford’s Theater, growing the endowment from $0 to $50 million. He renovated the theater and the museum. He can do this here; he can save the Corcoran with our help. But we’ve got to give him the chance, and then we all have to help him.
As always, if you have questions or if you would like to talk to anyone at Save the Corcoran, email email@example.com
If you are interested in joining or in other ways supporting our lawsuit, contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org. If you have views about the Trustees’ plan for the Corcoran, please send your thoughtful comments to the Office of the Attorney General at this link.
WASHINGTON, D.C.– The legal team representing the Save the Corcoran Coalition, a D.C. non-profit corporation, has filed a complaint and petition in D.C. Superior Court to intervene in the Corcoran Gallery of Art Board of Trustees’ cy près proceedings. The complaint, filed today by Andrew Tulumello of Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher LLP, charges the Trustees of the Corcoran Gallery of Art with financial mismanagement, corporate waste, and negligence in their duties. The suit is filed in response to the Trustees’ petition to the court for cy près to break the historic deed which established the Corcoran in 1869. Plaintiffs are students, alumni, faculty, staff, donors, and members of the Corcoran who believe that the Corcoran can be rebuilt, invigorated, and restored to new life.
“There are so many hard questions that need to be answered. We need to start there. If the Trustees want to dissolve a national, historic gem, we need to understand every wrong turn. We will never be able to get back our third oldest museum in the nation, and years of mismanagement is not a substantial explanation,” said Caroline Lacey, a Masters degree student currently enrolled at the Corcoran College of Art & Design, and a plaintiff on the suit. “We as the students have made very serious time and monetary commitments to the Corcoran, and we deserve full accountability.”
Representatives for Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher, LLP, added that the Trustees have not adequately explained why the Corcoran must be dissolved and that the request for cy près represents a long overdue opportunity for the Trustees to fully account for the failed stewardship over Washington, D.C.’s oldest private art museum.
“The Trustees have proposed the radical step of destroying the very institution they are charged with protecting. This is not necessary, and it is wrong,” said Andrew Tulumello, lawyer for Save the Corcoran and Managing Partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. “The public interest demands a more thoughtful approach.”
The suit states that the current deal to dissolve the Corcoran represents an expropriation of founder William Wilson Corcoran’s legacy, a dismantling of its key assets and features, and an abdication of the Trustees’ role as stewards of the Trust. “The Corcoran name, and the District of Columbia, deserve better,” said Jayme McLellan, a member of Save the Corcoran and adjunct faculty at the Corcoran. “At a minimum, we request that the Court not grant cy près relief until the Board provides a full financial accounting; and the complaint requests that the Court not reward the Trustees with such relief if their own unlawful actions have precipitated the Corcoran’s demise.”
Plaintiffs include students, faculty, staff, and donors at every level of the Corcoran. Together, they intend to intervene in the current cy près proceedings to ensure that they are transparent and reach an outcome that not only is in the best interests of the beneficiaries and potential beneficiaries of the Trust, but also is consistent with its original terms and purposes. Plaintiffs ask the Court to:
• remove members of the current Board of Trustees,
• ensure that the entire Corcoran collection remain together,
• require that the Board submit to a full financial accounting, and
• deny cy près relief if the Board’s own maladministration has caused the Corcoran trust to become impracticable.
The recently announced deal with George Washington University (GWU) and the National Gallery of Art is the latest step in the Trustees’ mismanagement of an historic institution. Under the terms of that deal, the famed Corcoran collection will be dismantled, and the College will be absorbed by GWU completely. Proceeds of the recent sales of artworks from the Corcoran collection, as well as prior deaccession income, will be handed over to underwrite GWU’s operations. The current deal will destroy the Corcoran forever.
“The Corcoran is gone,” someone shouted loudly and with frustration to me this weekend at an otherwise relaxing dinner party.
The comment didn’t make me mad; it didn’t make me want to cry into my napkin. What he barked was mostly true: The Corcoran, as we know it, is mostly gone. However, “mostly gone” is not all the way dead. Not yet.
As you may know — and I’m not going to rehash the details here — under the current plan created by a questionable Board, the Corcoran will soon be gone. It’s like watching the last buffalo roam the plains: The Corcoran on the verge of extinction; the oldest art museum in D.C.; a time capsule not only of American art, but of American history, about to transform into history itself. A 145-year legacy dissolved into name only, its great parts cut up and given away.
But isn’t a legacy something worth continuing? Meaning: We don’t have to dismember the past to move into the future. And if it is possible to save the Corcoran, shouldn’t we do everything we can — now — to try? We will never get this chance again.
The Corcoran does not have to be swallowed by the National Gallery of Art and George Washington University. If it is swallowed, it will be digested. If it is joined by them in partnership, with others, these venerable institutions can help the Corcoran to re-invent and stabilize itself, so that it can continue to inspire in its own unique way.
It is not too late. We can intervene before the dissolution.
Sometimes things reveal their own truth in layers. And the big truth here is that we really, really need the Corcoran. At this time in our nation’s history, there has never been a more important time to have a place designed for society to unite through art in a creative space. Museums and colleges succeed every day. It can happen.
But there’s no money, he said at dinner.
There is money. There’s an unprecedented amount of capital in Washington, and we have a solid way to tap the big resources while creating a plan to embrace grassroots support and a rapidly growing D.C. middle-class.
And, remember when Wayne Reynolds reached out to try to help the Corcoran? He meant it. Don’t forget that Mr. Reynolds is the guy who stepped in at Ford’s Theater when it was struggling financially and its old building needed repairs. In short order, he rebuilt the board, grew a $50 million endowment, and funded the renovation that has revitalized a place of historical significance.
He can do this for the Corcoran, as well. But we must come together, trust each other, and build something a little different and a lot better than what we were left with at the end. We can transform the sad, dying culture of the Corcoran back into one of inspiration and innovation. Many of the parts of the institution were, until a few months ago, still working. The Corcoran isn’t yet gone. Let’s not talk about her like she’s already dead.
Technically, the Board has just filed with the D.C. Superior Court a petition for cy pres to break the deed that established the Corcoran in 1869. Citing that they could not make it work under the original deed and charter, they will break its original founding doctrine.
The hearing for cy pres will happen on July 18, 2014. The Corcoran, as we know it, is not undone until the deed has been broken. And if it is broken, this is what we will lose:
- We lose Washington’s first art museum.
- We lose the third oldest museum in the nation.
- We lose an independent voice for the creative — a big one.
- We lose a place where young minds learn to make art; this means learning how to solve problems creatively.
- We lose an independent, creative voice not tied to the money of the state or the nation, but interdependent with its people.
- We lose a gathering place for the community (local, national and international) to come together for any reason we can collectively imagine through art.
- We lose a collection of 18,000 works of art which, kept together, could tell/present the story of the arts in Washington, D.C.
- We lose the Corcoran Archive, a resource which helps us remember and understand the past of the arts in Washington.
If we lose the Corcoran, in all but name only, we lose a great opportunity to create a space of pure inspiration. A place where the greatest inventions of the greatest minds could be shared, discussed, and integrated into our culture. This place could not only encourage the American Genius, as Mr. Corcoran set as the mission for his museum, it could inspire the American genius to action. We haven’t done this work yet – this is Corcoran phase two. There is no place in the world like what the Corcoran can be; and believe me, the path it’s on is not going to take it there.
Can we, at this moment in our shared history, afford to lose a place with this much potential?
The current deal put together by the Corcoran’s current Board of Trustees would mean:
- George Washington University gets the historic building, a time capsule of architecture and the crown-jewel of the Corcoran itself.
- George Washington University gets $16 million annually in tuition from the college.
- George Washington University gets up to $55 million in the Corcoran’s bank account recently accumulated through sold art, a bequest, and parking lot money – money that belongs to the Corcoran legacy, its students, its alumni, and its faculty and staff.
- The National Gallery of Art gets whatever art it wants, out of a picked apart historic collection, and some gallery space in the Corcoran where it will host contemporary exhibitions, NGA-style — i.e., conservative, and tied to public money. It will not be taking great risks. It will not be an innovator.
Wait a minute.
The same leaders who let fundraising slip from $16 million (in 2002) to $3 million today get to continue to call the shots?
The same leaders who, while spending almost two million dollars on consultants to tell them what to do, considered selling the flagship building and moving to Alexandria?
The same leaders who flubbed the deal with the University of Maryland after keeping staff and faculty waiting for resolution?
The same leadership who did not listen to its staff, alumni, students, members or community?
The same leaders who hired Fred Bollerer and Lauren Garcia — two people with zero experience in running a museum or an institute of higher education, one of whom gave everyone his or her pink slip and told them not to be negative on social media – to run the place? These leaders?
The question is: Are we going to let them?
No amount of planning, or protesting, or legal hoop-jumping is going to change the belief of many who think the Corcoran is already gone. But, fortunately, a core group of students, alumni, faculty, staff, donors, and members of the Corcoran think the Corcoran can be resuscitated. We think the Corcoran can become a place that incorporates the best from its past, while building on its greatest asset – the people who love and believe in it – to carry it into its future.
Imagine the Corcoran as the most amazing institution it can be where anything is possible. Hold that idea in your mind and email me about how you can help save it. It’s not too late.
Jayme McLellan, June 2014
Washington City Paper, Arts Desk
“The Corcoran Still Needs Permission to Dissolve Itself. Here’s Its Court Filing, Annotated.”
by Kriston Capps
Trustees of the Corcoran Gallery of Art and College of Art + Design filed a cy-près petition to the Superior Court of the District of Columbia seeking formal approval to revise the Corcoran’s federal charter. National Law Journal reporter Zoe Tillman spotted the filing yesterday. The petition would enable the Corcoran to go through with its plans to dissolve itself and be subsumed by the National Gallery of Art and George Washington University. (Catch up on the Corc issue with this backgrounder: “22 Questions for the Corcoran.”)
For the first time (and not for want of requests for comment), the Corcoran has outlined in its own words its reasoning for pursuing such a drastic solution to its problems. The entire document deserves a thorough fisking. Factually and semantically, there’s much to debate about the trustees’ reading of the situation. Officials at the University of Maryland, with whom the Corcoran pursued a deal over the course of several months before it was abruptly abandoned, come in for special treatment, for example.
Meanwhile, the trustees acknowledge that they have spent through the institution’s endowment, and indeed must “make determinations to invade the acquisition fund to maintain operations for the coming academic year.”
Two sections, in which the trustees demonstrate in two specific ways a willful misreading of their circumstances, merit special attention.
The Corcoran’s Standing Among Directors
The Corcoran’s court filing comes on the heels of scary headlines at another beleaguered museum. The Delaware Art Museum just lost its accreditation with the Association of Art Museum Directors over its decision to sell an 1868 painting by William Holman Hunt in order to pay down museum debt and replenish its endowment. In its judgment, the AAMD explains that other options were available to the Delaware Art Museum, including association help with fundraising. The judgment calls for indeterminate “sanctions,” asking members not to loan works to or collaborate on exhibits with the Delaware museum. “AAMD does not agree that the Delaware Art Museum had only two options to address its current financial challenges—sell works from the collection or close the museum,” the release reads.
Corcoran trustees dreaded running afoul of the Association of Art Museum Directors, as a lengthy passage in the cy-près petition reveals. In May, the AAMD applauded the Corcoran’s resolve to dissolve. While the Corcoran satisfied the high priests, the trustees sacrificed the body to do so.
Make no mistake: The Corcoran closed rather than take emergency measures. It is a slow-burn, graduated closure, but the Corcoran is closing. Worse, it is closing even as it committed the sin that the AAMD considers unpardonable: The museum sold the Clark Sickle-Leaf Carpet for $33.8 million in an auction of Middle Eastern and Asian rugs from the William A. Clark collection that netted the museum about $40 million. That money was never meant for future acquisitions, as the AAMD requires: By the June 2013 auction, the Corcoran had been looking to sell out for a full year. Now, whatever the Corcoran hasn’t spent from that auction purse goes to George Washington University.
From the petition:
Adherence to these [AAMD] guidelines is an essential element to maintain the Corcoran’s accreditation as a museum, which in turn assures the Corcoran’s ability to receive loans of art from other museums,
Which it can’t do closed.
attract qualified staff,
Which it can’t do closed.
participate in special and traveling exhibitions,
Which it can’t do closed.
and to maintain relationships with other museums.
Now its relationship with other museums is defined by who gets what from the Corcoran’s halls. Continuing on:
A determination by the Corcoran not to adhere to the guidelines would likely result in a loss of accreditation,
Which no longer matters (the museum violated those edicts anyway).
and would dramatically undermine the Corcoran’s reputation within the museum field,
and would likely substantially undermine its ability to recruit and retain qualified curatorial and other key museum staff,
Curators who are now clinging to one-year contracts with the National Gallery, staff who are looking at three months’ severance, adjunct instructors who have very little hope, but go on.
undercut its ability to raise funds,
More on this in a moment.
and substantially hinder if not eliminate its ability to participate in significant traveling exhibitions.
To be sure, the AAMD draws a bright line around museums treating their collections like piggy banks for good reason. Museums would destroy themselves, their histories, their legacies, and their communities if they all behaved like the Delaware Art Museum. Clearly, though, a slavish adherence to a safeguard principle isn’t always the right answer. No one thinks the Corcoran did something wrong by selling those rugs—the museum just sold them for the wrong reason.
The Corcoran’s Standing in Washington
In the petition, the trustees only partially address the institution’s dismal fundraising. The myopia they reveal is staggering. Reading on:
While the fundraising financial campaigns have produced support that has varied in amount from year to-year [sic] and purpose-to-purpose, the overall financial situation of the Corcoran has for several decades deteriorated. This deterioration is due to several factors.
What’s amazing is this passage doesn’t start with an institutional mea culpa—an apology for how the revolving door of directors, the constant bleed of knowledgeable administrators, and the alienation of key donors over the last decade ruined the Corcoran. Instead, the blame starts with D.C.:
First, the District of Columbia has lacked a substantial base of local, very wealthy donors dedicated to supporting local arts institutions, especially in comparison to other urban centers such as New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, or Philadelphia.
Arguably true in so many respects, but then, look to the Phillips Collection. Over a four-year period in which the Corcoran drew about $800,000 in contributions defined as “excess” for tax purposes—large gifts, in other words—the Phillips pulled in $23 million. Without even mounting a capital campaign.
One museum that does not merit a mention in this petition: The Phillips Collection. Instead, the Corcoran punches up:
The [National Gallery of Art] as a national institution receives federal funding support (while also seeking donations), and is open free of charge all year.
To be absolutely sure, the Corcoran is no National Gallery. It’s not a suitable comparison by any measure, except maybe longevity (the Corcoran is older).
Its location on the National Mall, its prestige as a national institution, and its greater funding resources, have undercut the Corcoran’s separate role as a museum within the District.
So how does the Phillips thrive on a residential street off Dupont Circle?
This effect has been compounded by the multiplication of Smithsonian and National Gallery–related specialist museums (e.g., the National Museum of American Art, the National Portrait Gallery, the Freer Gallery, and The Hirshhorn among others),
Brief sidebar: The Smithsonian American Art Museum, as it is known today, was called the “National Museum of American Art” between 1980 and 2000. That museum has gone by a lot of names. In fact, back when it was called the “National Institute,” and after its home at the Smithsonian Castle suffered a fire in 1865, Smithsonian stakeholders wound up lending artworks to the Corcoran for a time that stretched to several decades. Which just goes to show that the Corcoran has been around for a very, very long time. Its history dwarfs that of upstarts like the Hirshhorn. Its successes made other art museums possible.
History notwithstanding, research from the University of Chicago has indicated that even when museums expand within a single region, the spillover effects are not clear one way or another (positive or negative). It is not a given that the National Gallery thrives at the expense of the Corcoran.
all of which are open free-of-charge and are located on or close to the National Mall and in the area between the White House and the Capitol, thus establishing a major tourism nexus that is directed away from the Corcoran’s location west of the White House.
There are a lot of points worth considering when thinking about the future of the Corcoran: The costs it would take to bring the museum up to Americans with Disabilities Act compliance, the variable estimates for renovating the 19th-century Beaux-Arts building, the judgment the Corcoran showed in selling or mortgaging all its other properties. But this singular point—that a location within a stroller’s distance of the White House is a dead end—has always rankled the most.
For all intents and purposes, here’s the kicker to the saga:
Last, the Corcoran’s longstanding close relationship between the College and the Gallery has imposed the expenses of both, while hindering the development of a unique identity for either.
Yes, that’s right: In the end, the trustees of the Corcoran blame the museum and the college.
Read the Corcoran’s petition at the bottom of the original article here.
Dear Save the Corcoran Advisory Committee Members,
It is hard to believe, but it has been a year.
One year ago, we as a community first stood together, united in our concern, confusion and outrage over the proposed sale of the historic Ernest Flagg building that houses our beloved Corcoran.
In that year, we have witnessed the power of a motivated and mobilized community. We have seen the power of each and every one of you – and so many more – sharing your voice in the news, on social media, and face-to-face…and our voice was most certainly heard! Save the Corcoran is incredibly proud of our accomplishments this past year, and that certainly includes all of your tireless contributions. Thanks to your efforts, we know that the Corcoran will remain in its historic home.
Our mission, however, continues today. In spite of our accomplishments, the Corcoran still faces an uncertain future. We want you to know that Save the Corcoran remains fully committed to demanding total transparency and proper stewardship over the institution’s future. And this includes ensuring that Corcoran leaders recognize that the community deserves a real voice moving forward. We pledge that we will continue our efforts to work with Corcoran leaders, with the D.C. government, with our legal team, with the media, and with each of you to keep this mission alive. We simply believe that a whole and healthy Corcoran is most certainly worth that effort.
As we step into the next phase of our shared goal to Save the Corcoran, we look forward to working together with you.
The Save the Corcoran Coalition
Dear Corcoran Community,
On behalf of the Board of Trustees, I take great pleasure in sharing with you the news of an integral group of decisions approved at the board meeting today. Together, these decisions move us forward dramatically toward a sustainable future for both the Corcoran Gallery of Art and the Corcoran College of Art + Design.
1) We have approved a Memorandum of Understanding with the University of Maryland. This document opens the way to develop a permanent partnership sought by both institutions.
2) We have completed an agreement of unprecedented scope with the National Gallery of Art, under which the Corcoran will exhibit works of modern and contemporary art from the National Gallery’s collection during the three-year period when the East Building is under renovation.
3) We have appointed museologist Peggy Loar as Consulting Director of the Corcoran. Ms. Loar brings exceptional skills and experience to this position, having served as director of the Smithsonian Institution’s Traveling Exhibition Series, the first program director of the Institute of Museum Services, the founding director of the Wolfsonian Museum and Research Center and, most recently, the director of the National Museum of Qatar.
Fred Bollerer, who has so ably steered this institution through a period of financial risk, and who graciously extended his contract with the Corcoran at the board’s request, twice deferring his planned retirement, has kindly agreed to assist the transition as Peggy Loar moves into her new role.
4) We have adopted a Strategic Framework for a New Corcoran. It calls for the Corcoran to:
- focus on Contemporary Art, American Art, and Design
- build on a recognized commitment to community engagement; and
- develop an ability to address the cultural, social, economic and political issues of our day.
Initiatives specified in the Strategic Framework include reviving the Corcoran Biennial; extending the impact of the College by partnering with a leading local university; and working more broadly and deeply with partners in the Washington area to bring contemporary art into political and social discussion and debate.
All of these developments come in the context of an upswing in fundraising. Having successfully reorganized our development office in autumn 2012, we have experienced renewed engagement from donors and patrons including members, young professionals of the 1869 Society, corporations, and Trustees.
For the last two years, the Corcoran Board has grappled with some very difficult tasks. We are incredibly thankful for the commitment of our alumni, and look forward to sharing an extraordinary future with you.
You can read more about the Corcoran’s future by clicking here.
Chairman, Board of Trustees
Declaration for Campaign of Action
To the Corcoran Board of Trustees,
We, The Students for Saving the Corcoran, begin our campaign of action today at the Corcoran College of Art + Design as we have been incredibly troubled by the constant problems the Corcoran has endured due to an irresponsible administration. This action is in response to the lack of transparency and accountability that has plagued our college and museum for the past decade and now threatens the institution’s future stability and founding mission to encourage American Genius.
We have initiated this campaign because we believe you are leading the college down the wrong road. Continuous poor decision-making by the Board of Trustees and leadership has contributed to a dire financial deficit for which no one has been held accountable. The manner in which the Corcoran is being governed is deplorable and consequences must be faced for this blatant mismanagement. Your actions have disrupted our creativity and environment for learning, as well as jeopardizing the futures and careers of hundreds of students. You have left us with little choice than to bring your actions into public light.
We will continue our campaign until the following demands have been met:
1. The board of trustees must immediately implement structural changes with the goal of creating transparent and democratic decision-making process.
The administration’s gross mismanagement and cronyism warrants a new and different process than what has led the college into this crisis. To end this pattern, we have outlined initiatives that the board must take:
- Record and document board meetings and make minutes publicly available;
- Appoint a student, a faculty member, a staff member and alumni as voting members of the Board of Trustees;
- Implement a board member removal process where board members may be removed by a majority vote from the Corcoran student body and Faculty Association.
2. Chairman of the Board of Trustees, Harry F. Hopper III and Director Fred Bollerer must resign immediately.
- Under your tenure, the Corcoran has been set on a path to financial ruin. Your lack of vision, accountability, credentials and integrity has shown you are no longer suitable for the positions you hold.
3. Appoint Wayne Reynolds as Chairman of the Board of Trustees.
- The appointment of Mr. Reynolds will allow the Corcoran to thrive once again without the aid of a partner. It is our goal that the Corcoran remain independent until the institution is financially stable. Mr. Reynolds’ vision will realign the institution with the original intentions of its founder, William Wilson Corcoran, as a place for creativity, world-class contemporary art and the encouragement of American genius.
Dear Corcoran community and friends:
You surely are aware of the recent articles in the Washington Post about the Corcoran’s future and Wayne Reynolds’ hopes for it:
Please join us for a Corcoran community meeting with Mr. Reynolds and learn about his vision for what the Corcoran could become and why he cares. We’ll have plenty of time for questions and answers and students will be speaking as well.
Find out about
- How he sees the Corcoran’s potential for the future and how he can help to make it happen.
- How he plans to utilize the Corcoran’s strengths.
- How he plans to engage the creative thinkers within the institution as well as all who care deeply about it.
Learn more about how he wants to work with you, and other members of the Corcoran community, and how you can help.
Come prepared with your questions. Every voice matters.
“Top of the Hay” at the Hay Adams Hotel (800 16th Street NW)
Friday, March 29, 2013
Food and drink provided. Open bar.
If you care about the Corcoran, attend the Corcoran or work at the Corcoran, you should be at this meeting.
All are welcome but it would be helpful if you could RSVP so we know how much food to order to: